• Hacking News
    • Leaks
    • WikiLeaks
    • Anonymous
  • Tech
    • Android
    • Apple News
    • BlackBerry
    • Google News
    • Microsoft
    • Motorola
    • Nokia
    • Samsung
    • 3D
  • Cyber Crime
    • Phishing Scam
  • How To
  • Cyber Events
    • Censorship
    • Cyber Attacks
  • Security
    • Malware
  • Surveillance
    • Drones
    • NSA
    • Privacy
  • Explore
    • Gaming
    • Science
    • Viral
HackRead
  • March 9th, 2021
  • Home
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
HackRead
  • Hacking News
    • Leaks
    • WikiLeaks
    • Anonymous
  • Tech
    • Android
    • Apple News
    • BlackBerry
    • Google News
    • Microsoft
    • Motorola
    • Nokia
    • Samsung
    • 3D
  • Cyber Crime
    • Phishing Scam
  • How To
  • Cyber Events
    • Censorship
    • Cyber Attacks
  • Security
    • Malware
  • Surveillance
    • Drones
    • NSA
    • Privacy
  • Explore
    • Gaming
    • Science
    • Viral
  • Follow us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
Home
Hacking News
Anonymous

Does Hacktivism Really Equal Terrorism?

July 10th, 2016 Hatte E. James Cyber Events, Anonymous 0 comments
Does Hacktivism Really Equal Terrorism?
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
An act involving hacking of a computer or a website to deliver a religious, political or social message is known as hacktivism but is it an act of terrorism as well?

In early 2015, the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) made a bold move. It placed self-proclaimed hacktivist, Jeremy Hammond, already in jail, on its terrorism watchlist. While no one can argue that most cybercrime is just that: crime; is it really a logical jump from hacktivism to terrorism? The financial motivations of most cyber crime and the political motivations of hacktivists are where things get murky.

Must Read: The Anonymous Group: What is it and How big is it

If the FBI can prove that hacktivism really is terrorism, the implications for both hacktivists and the general public are, frankly, frightening.

Defining Terrorism

Most of the public knows the basic differences between hacktivism and hacking for profit or criminal gain. Yet do we really know how terrorism is defined by our governments? The FBI defines terrorism’s forms thus: “International terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;

  • Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

  • Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.*

  • “Domestic terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:

  • Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;

  • Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and

  • Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2332b defines the term “federal crime of terrorism” as an offense that:

  • Is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and

  • Is a violation of one of several listed statutes, including § 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a federal facility with a dangerous weapon); and § 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the U.S.).

A close reading of this code reveals that the definition of hacktivism, hacking for political motivations, typically with Denial of Service attacks, is likely not terrorism. Why?

According to the FBI, in order for an act to be considered terrorism, it must meet all of the requirements of each definition. An act must be illegal and violent or endanger human life, be coercive or intimidating, and occur in whichever jurisdiction fits. The code does not say that terrorism must meet one or all, but “means activities with these three characteristics.”  Most acts of hacktivism only tick one or two of these boxes, if at all.

New Definitions Needed?

It must be noted that the FBI’s terrorism definition is at least five years old, published in 2011. While hacktivism has been a part of the world since the 80s, it looks much different in 2016 than it did even five years ago.

One could also argue that most, if not all, acts of hacktivism constitute the commission of a crime. At the same time, the Denial of Service attack on a federal repository that makes no money and offers no sensitive information is not equal to the DoS on state emergency response site. The latter does indeed endanger human life, and if it is defined as illegal in that state, it constitutes a crime.

Yet does either of these constitute an act of terrorism? Taking a broad reading of the FBI’s code, the latter might certainly be terrorism. However, DoS attacks rarely do any true damage. That is their nature. They disrupt services, they don’t destroy anything tangible. Even the former could be seen as an act of terrorism, though no one is harmed by it. Legally, however, designating hacktivists as terrorists should only occur when all three of those “boxes” are ticked

Should our definition of terrorism change to meet the changes in hacktivism? When large-scale government services are disrupted and endanger lives en masse, hacktivism could indeed be classified as terrorism. Without changing any definitions, many hacktivists will either be jailed or coerced themselves out of the good that can come from their acts. Many of the most current acts of hacktivism are aimed at disrupting the activities of terrorist organizations, ones that meet all the FBI’s requirements of the definition.

[fullsquaread][/fullsquaread]

Must Read: What is Enforced Transparency? A Western Trend?

It cannot be denied that terrorism is turning digital. What is at issue is prosecuting and alienating a few people based on a narrow definition. Either the definition needs to become broader, or hacktivism needs to be excepted from it. There is no easy answer.

[src src=”Top, Featured Image Via” url=”https://pixabay.com/en/hacker-www-binary-internet-code-1446193/”]PixaBay/Bykst[/src]

  • Tags
  • cyber attacks
  • FBI
  • hacking
  • HACKTIVISM
  • internet
  • security
  • Terrorism
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest
Previous article Ukrainian Hacker Hacks Polish Telecom Giant Netia; Leaks Massive Data
Next article Amazon Suffers Security Breach; 80,000 Login Credentials Leaked (Updated)
Hatte E. James

Hatte E. James

Related Posts
Google, YouTube, Gmail service suffered major outage worldwide

Google, YouTube, Gmail service suffered major outage worldwide

TikTok Global – Trump Demanded Full TikTok Ownership

TikTok Global – Trump Demanded Full TikTok Ownership

Dark Web's Empire market down for days after massive DDoS attack

Dark Web's Empire market down for days after massive DDoS attack

Newsletter

Get the best stories straight into your inbox!



Don’t worry, we don’t spam

Latest Posts
European Banking Authority victim in Microsoft Exchange Server hack
Hacking News

European Banking Authority victim in Microsoft Exchange Server hack

FluBot Android malware mimics FedEx, Chrome apps to steal user data
Android

FluBot Android malware mimics FedEx, Chrome apps to steal user data

John McAfee Charged with Fraud in Cryptocurrency Scam
Cyber Crime

John McAfee Charged with Fraud in Cryptocurrency Scam

HACKREAD is a News Platform that centers on InfoSec, Cyber Crime, Privacy, Surveillance and Hacking News with full-scale reviews on Social Media Platforms & Technology trends. Founded in 2011, HackRead is based in the United Kingdom.

Follow us